La franquesa i la transparència en la retòrica presidencialals Estats Units
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2007.20.123-140Abstract
In contrast to Strauss’ esoteric art of writing (which provides the philosopher with a kind of language that will be understood only by those who will not persecute him), Antonio Lastra proposes a constitutional art of writing, based on the frankness and the transparency inspired by the founding texts of the United States, in particular, the Constitution. That rhetoric of frankness is present in presidential addresses, but behind that transparency lies the desire to reinforce the citizens’ identification with institutions and, especially, to convince the public about the rightness of any decision that the government has made frankly and openly and which has been scrutinized by the media. In a society which enjoys freedom of speech, we can make the mistake of punishing lies more than evil, or of justifying the worst errors if made openly and in the glare of the mass media.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2006 Tripodos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Once an article has been approved for publication in Tripodos, the exclusive right to publish the work becomes the property of Blanquerna School of Communication and International Relations of Ramon Llull University. These rights can be granted to a third party with the agreement of the author(s).
Until the articles have been approved for publication, Blanquerna School of Communication and International Relations of Ramon Llull University has no rights over them.
The submission of articles is understood to represent explicit consent to these conditions of publication.








